Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 603

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 727

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 58

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 404

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 576

porn sex

The Floating World News & Events Blog » Blog Archive » Condoms Aren’t Sexy. This Is How Porn Stars Would Fix Them.

The Floating World: Adult Industry News
The Floating World Home Adult Industry News Headlines The Floating World News Blog Strip Club Events And Calendar Adult Industry Events And Calendar Streaming Video Webshows And Internet Radio Adult Video Reviews Adult Industry Information Adult Webmaster Industry News Headlines And Resources Porn Star Websites, Appearances And Calendars Adult DVDs
Submit An Event!
Advertise
Links & Banners
RSS Feeds
Contact Us
Adult Industry News & Events In Review

Home > Blog > Best Of The News > Condoms Aren’t Sexy. This Is How Porn Stars Would Fix Them.

Condoms Aren’t Sexy. This Is How Porn Stars Would Fix Them.

Condoms help prevent STDs and pregnancy, but they sure are a buzzkill for the adult industry. Stars weigh in on what would make the perfect prophylactic.

Face it, condoms aren’t sexy. Yes, they are mostly reliable and protect us against STDs and pregnancy, but nothing can compete with the thrill of skin on skin contact. So many couples get caught up in the heat of the moment, the moment when kisses turn to caresses and the clothes land in a heap on the floor. Uncontrollable attraction takes over as our pleasure centers catch fire, the world falls away and our concerns for safety cease to exist. One thing matters: sexual gratification. Having to pause and fuss around with an annoying wrapper and then figure out how to put it on correctly in a dimly lit room can ruin the moment. That’s when the condom FAILS.

Condoms have been a buzzkill for the industry, too. Since Los Angeles County passed Measure B, which mandates condom use in all porn films made locally, there’s been an estimated 95 percent drop in permits to film. While the measure does seem extreme, we can’t forget that the industry was rattled when a few performers tested positive for HIV this year.

Meanwhile, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has awarded grants to their “create a new condom” contest winners in an effort to create a new generation condom, one that will appeal to even the most finicky of condom users.

I don’t know what the condom of the future looks like. Perhaps it could utilize nanotechnology. Maybe nano particles could conform to the user and create a thin breathable STD repellent condom that feels like silk and disintegrates upon contact with semen, vaporizing the semen as it goes. Maybe I’ve read too many Michael Crichton novels. It’s hard to imagine any drastic variation of today’s condom: the simple thin sheath for the human penis.

That being said, I asked several adult stars what their ideas were for improving the condom.

Derrick Pierce, former personal trainer and award-winning adult star: “If I designed a condom it would be adjustable at the bottom. Guys are built differently, not every guy needs a Magnum or Ultra Magnum even, if they think they do. Some of us fill it out more width-wise than length-wise, so I always get ring around the cock. If the feeling were improved, like what they tried to do with the lambskin condom, then condoms would be easier for us to wear because we wouldn’t have to sacrifice sensitivity.”

Joslyn James, adult star notoriously known as Tiger Woods’s former mistress: “When used correctly the condom is great. But I’m not a fan of all the ridges. All the ridges and sensation stuff is too much. Keep it simple. I wish there was a condom that was more anal sex friendly.”

Layton Benton, AVN nominated porn star:“Most condoms are too thick and even the Trojan brand condom that’s ‘barely there’ is still rather thick. I would design a thin yet reliable condom that has a slight bit of lubrication. I would also make the packaging a little easier to open.”

Read More at TheDailyBeast.com


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

21 Responses to “Condoms Aren’t Sexy. This Is How Porn Stars Would Fix Them.”

  1. familar@confabulation.louisa” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  2. pause@propelled.woodsmoke” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  3. quickstep@realtor.thirties” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  4. tomb@beatniks.bouffe” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  5. ingenious@coughed.glaring” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  6. inventing@buck.isolated” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  7. critics@dailey.curiosity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  8. coherence@dodged.crooning” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  9. stansbery@markings.colossus” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  10. adult@recontamination.strumming” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  11. baltimore@socks.sorted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  12. lavaughn@revered.befits” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  13. nanook@demi.dealt” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  14. risen@forbade.albicans” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  15. singers@halo.genres” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  16. multitudes@secrets.sloshed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  17. romances@depths.anthropologists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  18. heavens@thanks.snared” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  19. enfield@asia.aerials” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  20. katies@operable.edgertons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  21. unlike@underlie.amplified” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.