Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 584

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 603

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 702

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 727

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 58

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 404

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/thefloat/public_html/blog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 576

porn sex

The Floating World News & Events Blog » Blog Archive » LukeIsBack.com Celebrates An Adultcon Boycott

The Floating World: Adult Industry News
The Floating World Home Adult Industry News Headlines The Floating World News Blog Strip Club Events And Calendar Adult Industry Events And Calendar Streaming Video Webshows And Internet Radio Adult Video Reviews Adult Industry Information Adult Webmaster Industry News Headlines And Resources Porn Star Websites, Appearances And Calendars Adult DVDs
Submit An Event!
Advertise
Links & Banners
RSS Feeds
Contact Us
Adult Industry News & Events In Review

Home > Blog > From The Editor > LukeIsBack.com Celebrates An Adultcon Boycott

LukeIsBack.com Celebrates An Adultcon Boycott

From LukeIsBack.com:

Adultcon BOYCOTTED Here

Adultcon has every right to pick and choose who to “allow” to rent booths at their convention. But when I hear they are deciding this based on who they think is pretty enough or mainstream enough, I don’t have to support them by putting up stories about their convention or who is appearing at it.

From what I’ve seen of their contract, transsexuals are not allowed at all, and girls must submit pictures along with your application so they can be judged height/weight appropriate.

That means that fans of T/S or Big beautiful woman or Big booty girls aren’t going to see THEIR favorite stars at the convention, because those stars weren’t ALLOWED to be there.

This makes no sense to me and smacks of discrimination. Are they not allowing effeminante gay boys who are 5′5 and weigh 110? I”m sure that is not height/weight appropriate for a man? Are they not allowing female models who are 5′10 and weight 105? That is also not height/weight appropriate.

I will say that Adultcon can run their business anyway they want. But when I feel that an important part of the adult community is being excluded based on Adultcon’s random standard, don’t expect to see anything else about their convention here, unless it’s an apology and a policy reversal.

From Terri at TheFloatingWorld.com:

Hi Cindi,

I read your article, and I didn’t quote it on my site at first because I … um … disagreed.

What a dick I am - I should have gone into the specifics, i.e., in the State of California, Renaud and Adultcon don’t have the right to discriminate against BB Women unless they have jumped through a bunch of preparatory hoops, many of which should have been included in their performer contracts and restrictions.

For one, we have different civil rights laws here than the Federal government does, and for two, the Adultcon contract never specifies that performers have to be height/weight proportionate.

If Adultcon weren’t so cheap, it would have consulted with a couple of lawyers over the past 6 years to make sure it isn’t breaking the law. And while on the subject of ‘cheap’ – Adultcon could have hired a real, “respected”, publicist years ago as well; most of the industry’s media outlets wouldn’t be boycotting Adultcon now if it had. Even the Adultcon ‘Official Media Sponsor’, XBIZ.com, isn’t running anything on its home page about the show. What does that tell you? And does that tell you something about Adultcon or about XBIZ?

I post an article and performer list for the Adultcon show out of respect to all of the performers and companies that are suffering through another Adultcon at this very moment.

Your considered points after I tuned out and became all high and mighty, are all legitimate, of course.

Terri


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.